Update hexadecimal sort after review
- Use Array.map instead of for-loop - Add test case
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b3c27072f
commit
ba24e12454
@ -143,22 +143,18 @@ class Sort extends Operation {
|
||||
* @returns {number}
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static _hexadecimalSort(a, b) {
|
||||
const a_ = a.split(/([^\da-f]+)/i),
|
||||
let a_ = a.split(/([^\da-f]+)/i),
|
||||
b_ = b.split(/([^\da-f]+)/i);
|
||||
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < a_.length; ++i) {
|
||||
const t = parseInt(a_[i], 16);
|
||||
if (!isNaN(t)) {
|
||||
a_[i] = t;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
a_ = a_.map(v => {
|
||||
const t = parseInt(v, 16);
|
||||
return isNaN(t) ? v : t;
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < b_.length; ++i) {
|
||||
const t = parseInt(b_[i], 16);
|
||||
if (!isNaN(t)) {
|
||||
b_[i] = t;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
b_ = b_.map(v => {
|
||||
const t = parseInt(v, 16);
|
||||
return isNaN(t) ? v : t;
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < a_.length && i < b.length; ++i) {
|
||||
if (isNaN(a_[i]) && !isNaN(b_[i])) return 1; // Numbers after non-numbers
|
||||
|
@ -30,4 +30,15 @@ TestRegister.addTests([
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "SeqUtils - Hexadecimal sort",
|
||||
input: "06,08,0a,0d,0f,1,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,1a,1b,1c,1d,1e,1f,2,3,4,5,7,9,b,c,e",
|
||||
expectedOutput: "1,2,3,4,5,06,7,08,9,0a,b,c,0d,e,0f,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,1a,1b,1c,1d,1e,1f",
|
||||
recipeConfig: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"op": "Sort",
|
||||
"args": ["Comma", false, "Numeric (hexadecimal)"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user