# Alternatives There are tons of static site generators and themes out there and choosing the right one for your tech stack is a tough decision. If you're unsure if Material for MkDocs is the right solution for you, this section should help you evaluate alternative solutions. ## Docusaurus [Docusaurus] by Facebook is a very popular documentation generator and a good choice if you or your company are already using [React] to build your site. It will generate a [single page application] which is fundamentally different from the site Material for MkDocs generates for you. __Advantages__ - Very powerful, customizable and extendable - Provides many components that aid in technical writing - Large and rich ecosystem, backed by Facebook __Challenges__ - High learning curve, JavaScript knowledge mandatory - JavaScript ecosystem is very volatile, rather high maintenance - More time needed to get up and running While [Docusaurus] is one of the best choices when it comes to documentation sites that output a single page application, there are many more solutions, including [Docz], [Gatsby], [Vuepress] and [Docsify] that approach this problem similarly. [Docusaurus]: https://docusaurus.io/ [React]: https://reactjs.org/ [single page application]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-page_application [Docz]: https://www.docz.site/ [Gatsby]: https://www.gatsbyjs.com/ [VuePress]: https://vuepress.vuejs.org/ [Docsify]: https://docsify.js.org/ ## Jekyll [Jekyll] is probably one of the most mature and widespread static site generators and is written in [Ruby]. It is not specifically geared towards technical project documentation and has many themes to choose from, which can be challenging. __Advantages__ - Battle-tested, rich ecosystem, many themes to choose from - Brings great capabilities for blogging (permalinks, tags, etc.) - Generates a SEO-friendly site, similar to Material for MkDocs __Challenges__ - Not specifically geared towards technical project documentation - Limited Markdown capabilities, not as advanced as Python Markdown - More time needed to get up and running [Jekyll]: https://jekyllrb.com/ [Ruby]: https://www.ruby-lang.org/de/ ## Sphinx [Sphinx] is an alternative static site generator specifically geared towards generating reference documentation, offering powerful capabilities that are lacking in MkDocs. It uses [reStructured text], a format similar to Markdown, which some users find harder to use. __Advantages__ - Very powerful, customizable and extendable - Generates reference documentation from [Python docstrings] - Large and rich ecosystem, used by many Python projects __Challenges__ - High learning curve, [reStructured text] syntax might be challenging - Search is less powerful than the one provided by MkDocs - More time needed to get up and running If you're considering using Sphinx because you need to generate reference documentation, you should give [mkdocstrings] a try – an actively maintained and popular framework building on top of MkDocs, implementing Sphinx-like functionality. [Sphinx]: https://www.sphinx-doc.org/ [reStructured text]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReStructuredText [Python docstrings]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0257/ [mkdocstrings]: https://github.com/mkdocstrings/mkdocstrings ## GitBook [GitBook] offers a hosted documentation solution that generates a beautiful and functional site from Markdown files in your GitHub repository. However, it was once Open Source, but turned into a closed source solution some time ago. __Advantages__ - Hosted solution, minimal technical knowledge required - Custom domains, authentication and other enterprise features - Great collaboration features for teams __Challenges__ - Closed source, not free for proprietary projects - Limited Markdown capabilities, not as advanced as Python Markdown - Many Open Source projects moved away from GitBook Many users switched from [GitBook] to Material for MkDocs, as they want to keep control and ownership of their documentation, favoring an Open Source solution. [GitBook]: https://www.gitbook.com/