mirror of
https://github.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material.git
synced 2024-12-18 10:25:58 +01:00
98 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
98 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
date: 2023-10-02
|
||
authors: [squidfunk, alexvoss]
|
||
categories:
|
||
- General
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Sunsetting Gitter: Towards Efficient Community Engagement
|
||
|
||
__As we're starting to build a team around Material for MkDocs, we've decided to
|
||
sunset and archive our [Gitter] channel on October 13, 2023 in favor of
|
||
[GitHub Discussions].__
|
||
|
||
As part of our efforts to improve the processes for maintaining Material for
|
||
MkDocs and for supporting the community, we have reviewed the use of different
|
||
communication channels. At the moment, both [Gitter] and [GitHub Discussions]
|
||
allow to ask the community for support and to discuss ideas and issues. In the
|
||
past weeks, we have begun to question whether this duplication is in the best
|
||
interest of our project. This post explains the rationale behind our decision.
|
||
|
||
[our sponsors]: ../../insiders/index.md#how-to-become-a-sponsor
|
||
[Gitter]: https://gitter.im/squidfunk/mkdocs-material
|
||
[GitHub discussions]: https://github.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material/discussions
|
||
|
||
<!-- more -->
|
||
|
||
## The Constraints of Gitter
|
||
|
||
In the first years of Material for MkDocs, [Gitter] served as a helpful platform
|
||
for quick community interactions and questions. However, there are some inherent
|
||
constraints that necessitated a shift. Here's a breakdown of the challenges we
|
||
encountered:
|
||
|
||
1. __Thread utilization__ –
|
||
Even with the introduction of threads, many Gitter users were reticent to
|
||
use them, leading to cluttered and disconnected conversations, making it
|
||
difficult to follow.
|
||
|
||
2. __Search and discovery__ –
|
||
Gitter's structure and interface makes it cumbersome to search for and
|
||
retrieve past messages, resulting in lost insights and repeated conversations.
|
||
|
||
1. __User interface__ –
|
||
After the acquisition by [Element], the user interface of Gitter has
|
||
experienced a severe decline, becoming more complicated, less intuitive and
|
||
user-friendly.
|
||
|
||
1. __Access mandate__ –
|
||
The necessity for users to grant access to their GitHub accounts to use
|
||
Gitter posed an unnecessary access barrier and potential security concerns.
|
||
|
||
[Element]: https://element.io/blog/gitter-is-joining-element/
|
||
|
||
## GitHub Discussions
|
||
|
||
Thankfully, [GitHub Discussions] emerged and continues to evolve to be a much
|
||
better alternative, eliminating many of Gitter's constraints and offering
|
||
enhanced functionality:
|
||
|
||
1. __Threaded conversations__ –
|
||
GitHub Discussions supports structured, threaded conversations, ensuring
|
||
discussions are coherent, contextual, and easy to follow for everyone.
|
||
|
||
2. __Integration and linking__ –
|
||
the platform facilitates seamless linking to other discussions, issues, code,
|
||
and much more, enriching conversations and providing comprehensive context.
|
||
|
||
3. __A unified platform__ –
|
||
GitHub acts as a one-stop shop for support, allowing users to access varied
|
||
resources and support channels in one place, greatly improving user
|
||
experience.
|
||
|
||
4. __Discoverability__ –
|
||
GitHub Discussions are easily searchable and allow for categorization,
|
||
preventing loss of valuable insights and fostering knowledge sharing.
|
||
|
||
## Conclusion
|
||
|
||
Sunsetting [Gitter] is a leap towards creating more efficient, user-friendly,
|
||
and enriched community interactions. By consolidating communication to
|
||
[GitHub Discussions], we seek to mitigate the fragmentation of information,
|
||
ease the user journey, and fortify the bonds within our community.
|
||
|
||
This concentrated approach enables us to provide consistent, fast and quality
|
||
support to our users. In the past, the nature of queries raised on Gitter
|
||
typically necessitated supplementary information or reproductions, prompting us
|
||
to advise users to initiate a discussion subsequently. The shift to a
|
||
centralized discussion forum is designed to simplify and accelerate this
|
||
procedure, ensuring swift and efficient resolutions for our community. It is a
|
||
testament to our ongoing commitment to support the community that helps Material
|
||
for MkDocs flourish.
|
||
|
||
We are confident that this streamlined approach will spur more
|
||
fruitful discussions, innovative ideas, and collective growth, and we are
|
||
excited to continue our journey with the unwavering support and active
|
||
participation of our community.
|
||
|